Martinez publishes (finally) a comment of mine and responds

Brandon wrote a piece, again, yesterday, that looked like a roundabout response to some articles I put out on him. I took it as an opportunity to try to comment and see if he would publish it, being careful not to mention his real name (ZCF) for that is an automatic comment discard. To my surprise, for the second time in eighteen months with many many tries in between, he did publish the comment. What will be interesting to see is if he cuts off my ability to continue the dialogue by not publishing the ones that, as I write this, are waiting to be moderated....

If he  responds to my latest comments, this article will be expanded. Brandon naturally threw out some unflattering remarks to insinuate my idiocy, acted as if because I didn't do deep research my thoughts were therefore lacking, implied that guilt by association was somehow wrong to consider when making a claim, statement or point of view, and just plain engaged in a continuation of his habit to  find everybody the enemy but imply that he could discern when an enemy was speaking truth worth regurgitating....

It doesn't seem to be an issue to Brandon that his sources all support Israel in an unqualified fashion, they all accept government explanations of false flag staged events at the same time they give us "privileged information" apparently credible in Brandon's eyes about the enemies of the US. Brandon seems to feel the need with his advocacy to adopt "the fairness doctrine" with habitual liars but I would question as to whether it is "fair" to his audience to throw out statements as facts from proven liars who make up facts to suit. I would question why does he have this new found need, as Brandon, to be fair with such folks....

As I reread some of Zander's responses I have to marvel at his "Jewish" ability to misdirect. When he says that it is irrelevant, Dawisha's supporting every false flag promoted by the MSM and her belief in the government OCT on 911, as to whether I find her credible on Putin, it is simply laughable and the claim only works with sheep and subversive elements within our movement and the MSM.

This is my rule. Once a person who clearly knows the truth is shown to be a proven liar, they should only be quoted in order to critique them as such or, at a bare minimum, quote them with a disclaimer. Zander by not doing so makes it "ok" to lie in support of government  narratives that are likely nothing more than subversive propaganda. Once it is a determined that a person gets his message out through instruments that lie for big brother, routinely when it counts and no one else,  one can assume their narrative is twisted in a way to serve the elites. It can be assumed to be untrustworthy.

I would also say as Zander always goes here, that huge detail of a subject is often used to then spread disinfo on the matter because it  numbs the audience to accept their claims. Therefore judging by whom these sources associate with and what has already been determined about their credibility can quickly determine if it's worth your time to listen to them...

His further misdirection here is to bring Putin in and what he thinks. My challenges to Zander didn't center on what Putin thinks but on what Zander's sources, that attack Putin, thinks. Again, Jewish type misdirection...

The argument that I am obligated to prove that Browder is  untrustworthy is another laughable commodity. When you see someone hanging out all the time with low level thugs, you can assume he is a thug till it's proven otherwise. By your slant, it is we that have to prove that already demonstrated, habitual liars are not lying. A win for the elites, a win for the Jews and a win for a pundit such as you, Brandon but not a win for us...

Also, Brandon, regurgitating claims about Russian corruption given out by enemies of Russia is like, wow, totally stupid while you using adjectives like "Putrid" implies that you are part of their lying game. You let a provocateurish adjective take the place of facts which you, at the same time, claim I don't have. Classic Jewish misdirection. The fact is you can't pick and choose the times you want to believe a liar. You assume a liar is lying till it's proved otherwise.

I have "pictured" all the dialogue for you to read....

all comments can be clicked on to enhance....

It's beginning to look like a TKO. Four hours after leaving comments for moderation, they are still unpublished as Brandon continues to get the last word on his site through censorship but since you, goy, are on my site, you get the rest of the story, all the comments in the mix and it looks like:

the official is about to declare me the winner

,-------------------------------------------------------

As it looks more and more that Brandon has censored my further comments in order to give himself the last word, let us look at the article which he wrote to better understand what drives Brandon. For some reason he has linked the idea  that people like me that complain about his MSM sources don't understand that imperfect MSM sources still doesn't disprove the claimed problems with Putin. As my points concerning Brandon have been to neither affirm or deny what or who Putin is, whether he is good or evil, compromised or independent, I am a little baffled by the linkage...

My particular beef with Brandon is that it appears he has an agenda to find fault with Putin, enough so that he will use very compromised sources to bolster his claims. The type of sources that if used by an opposing view, he would be quick to denigrate. When I pointed out that he used  video hit pieces when providing his own backup, pieces that provided no proof but offered claims of proof, he went into a long diatribe how I haven't read Dawisha or Browder's books. Well that maybe true but the books weren't in the article,  the  attack videos were that offered no proof...

All these videos below support in fawning fashion NWO operatives, Dawisha and Browder. In fact, you can not find anyone in the MSM I challenging any of this and this is what Brandon uses for backup representing "Non-alignment"?

Not only that but those who made the videos and who credited Dawisha for all the content,  proved their zionist viewpoint when I simply looked at their point of view in other videos and how they word everything in a way that's "good for Jews". Why, pray tell would you throw sources at your readers that have a proven track record of carrying Jew water? I gotta ask!...

Then he goes onto make a simplistic argument that the MSM attacks ISIS so if we disbelieve the MSM, that means we have to believe that ISIS is good. This is what I call "acting like a Jew lawyer".

All it means if the MSM is attacking ISIS is that they want us to be scared of ISIS. That is all it means. It doesn't tell us who ISIS is, or if they are good or bad. Brandon's simplistic approach is simply too simplistic to defend. It doesn't cover all areas of concern. Determining if a source can be trusted is just the beginning of the dissection process but Zander is making out as if it is all of the dissection process. Again, this is simply Jew lawyering at it's worst....

When Brandon concludes that whether or not the MSM likes or dislikes Putin is irrelevant to his true worth, I have to say it's not irrelevant, when determining the worth, to see it being orchestrated in a uniform way by a large collective body.

It's a red flag, folks!

Brandon simply chooses to ignore these variables and is simply out to win his argument as opposed to get at the truth as to what is relevant and what is important....

Is it important to obsess on Putin when all our dictators around us are, at minimum, at least as corrupt? I think not and again, I have to ask:

Why is it so important for the goy to have nobody to believe in? This does seem to be Brandon's job, to poke holes in any positive conclusion about anything going on with resistance and it has been that way since ZCF disappeared and Brandon showed up in 2014

Read 2046 times Last modified on Friday, 20 May 2016 20:10
Blindlight

I am the "RAPE FACE" (FROM YOUR NIGHTMARES)

Always remember the limits which goys set for themselves. Their thinking has stagnated within these limits, and they are unable to go beyond them. Therein lies their misfortune and our advantage. Speak and act in a way which their morality and their concepts do not permit.

Do things which seem to them to be impossible and incredible. They will not believe that you are capable of words and actions of which they are not capable. 

Speak and act in a way which is confident, energetic, aggressive, discouraging and stunning. Produce more noise and oral trumpery, and say more things which are incomprehensible and pseudo-scientific.

 

blindlight.org/index.php/blindlight