Hitler was, in this speech, referring to Jewish lyingMiles Mathis - everyone he analyzes is a secret Jew but the conspiracy is, somehow, not Jewish and the Holocaust can be ignored
I learned with VK Clark, consistent pictures of the same human body does not automatically mean the person is one and the same with the one offering them up. Every operative has to present some sort of believable back story to who they are
I have been "watching" Miles Mathis for close to three years now. I became aware of him through the Henry Makow site, itself, clearly, with it's negative Hitler obsession and holohoax denial, belonging to the "limited hangout category". The one that drew my attention was his claim that Bob Dylan was a creation of the Deep State and was probably not the true writer of most of his material.
Since then, I have learned that the protocols of Zion were an aristocratic conspiracy, Jack London was not from the lower class, and too was a Deep State subversive (a favorite writer of mine) Hitler's accomplishments were all Deep State approved, staged events (meaning WW II was totally unnecessary).
I came down on the side he, Mathis, was compromised when I read his interrogation of the protocols, totally ignoring the text and how it so well mimicked Jewish real behavior easily observed by those who look past the typical distractions used to cover their movements up and the fact he, by ignring the content, behaved in a manner similar to Jewish power when it treats a threat. It uses misdirection to incriminate the target and avoids obvious important data as irreelevant, again, by omission.
I think I truly became aware of how lacking in any real integrity our system had during the Obama democratic nomination process and how obvious lies were being portrayed as legitimate uncontested issues and concerns. I, at the time, was not particularly false flag aware, nor had I linked 911 to a false flag, Deep State operation, as opposed to the, promoted, Arab one, stated as fact.
Also, worthy of note, before the protocols and before my using that article to declare Mathis as a subversive, he rarely named the Jew in any of his exposing operations but something happened to Miles right after, and just go to his site now and look at the exposure of any famous persons ancestry and it's full of Jewish subversive families. However, when questioned, the Deep State problem is not a Jewish problem, somehow, according to Mathis. And while it's clearly needed, he seems to say, to question the motives of Hitler, Ezra Pound, the Czars, in his view, agents of the Deep State, the exposure of a lifetime, the holocaust, he leaves untouched (a quick glance through his material seems to encase a void where it comes to 911 truth as well but I could be wrong there).
Like Anglin, whom this writer has exposed, the amount of material posted on his website attributed to him is suspect considering all his other claimed occupations. What's not to apply all the things behind the scenes supporting some subversive figurehead (Which Mathis claims of those he outs) to Mathis as well?
Is it purely coincidence that his last name mimics his math obsession credentials? Is it a coincidence that two "M"s turned sideways make the number 33 and is it a coincidence his claimed place of birth is the 33rd parallel? These are the kinds of evidence Mathis himself uses to expose folks having masonic links. What's good for the goose? Also recall, the Deep State must inform you what they are doing, it's part of the code. It's in plain site, Mathis is equal to all those he writes articles on. He's not who he claims
I do suppose Mathis influenced my need to explain on the "rich race" link to the Jew race. In "New Slant on Race" I noted that when Jews take over a society they have to cleanse the system of folks unaccepting of these facts, which means many of the ruling class who don't bend the knee must go.
What you have left are members of the rich race who are used to an abundance of privilege and who will do whatever is necessary to hold onto their privilege. Any prior loyalties to their own underclass is diluted in the need to survive within their "rich race" niche and conform to their Jewish master's aims.
So when positions taken are opposed to the public good but good for Jewish ruling elites, the latter's preference always wins because of the very real reality of what happens to folks of privilege when they oppose the status quo.
They are often sent in to be "us" and praise the goal that's good for them as being good for us. (Also called controlling the opposition)
This, then, is why this accommodation, of corporations to the globalist agenda, dominates and they all love race-mixing, globalism and wars that make no sense and oppose boycotting Israel.
Anyone not accommodating will be removed from the rich race and either killed or thrown to the local useless eaters they live near, losing their prior "Master race" status to become a slave with the other 99%. Their corporation will be swallowed by some good goy devotee willing to dance on que.
This too is why the holocaust is never questioned in the MSM >Those that would are removed and edited out for our consumption
So, what can we assume without proof about Miles? He's a member of, at minimum, the rich race who is planting information the elites think undermines the causes of any possible real resistance but doing so while portraying "a light bringer". He probably gets a lot of information researched for him with the same person putting the material together in a consistent, day after day, form to represent him (which very well may be "Miles"). We can assume this until someone produces information to the contrary and it stands up to the scrutiny of peers as legit. This is a similar MO for how we should react to "real event dramas" that have all the appearance of staged events which is to claim they are staged do to the "chronic liar" issue I have spoeken of before. (One assumes a known chronic liar is lying and confronts the claim rather than arguing as if the claim was real)
Sadly, people now in that position like a Richard Spencer are beholden their positons to the deep state and will never say outloud, "The emperor has no clothes
I dare say we will have trouble finding out about Miles Mathis's real history or even his real name.
Why it's important for a Mathis to put out this stuff is because it reinforces the idea that nothing can be done about your fate. Mathis has never offered up a hero for us to emulate but only those who were less than half the man the history books tell us. He spends much of his time going after our heroes to tear them down, and leaves the "lynch-pin lies", that hold up the "house of cards" alone.
I admit, I am sure I come off this way as well, at times but I have always believed it was possible to convince people in large enough numbers that there were ways to subvert the Deep State mind control that keeps us enslaved. It's why I back Hitler and the believed history of those in the rabbit hole who I feel are not compromised in regards to him.
Mathis wants you to believe, judging by the answers he finds, that all our claimed heroes were part of that mind control, part of that subversion. Even if mostly true, it's those intentional fibs that I have decided he engages in, that makes him a subversive.
Also, to meet Miles in real life usually takes shekles or a paid event or weekend that he profits from. Anther slogan of mine is we need volunteers not profiteers. Though I am sure Miles would try to make the case he is a volunteer, I have seen nothing about him that shows real concern about changing the status quo. I would lump him in with ZCF, folks that are assigned to pretend to be us and care not to associate with us beyond screened comments under site articles