Fake History, Real story of The Inquisition
Take the Spanish Inquisition for instance.
Especially hated by Jews, because it was primarily directed against those Jews who falsely portrayed themselves to be Christian and thus potentially allowing them to help Muslims retake Spain again, as the Jews had conspired and colluded with Muslim invaders to take Spain 800 years earlier.
Catholics in Britain and Germany were being converted by Jews into pseudo Christians of a Judas persuasion. All fire and brimstone, and little love of Jesus.
They needed the Jewish fake history of the Inquisition, to help them justify their hatred of Catholics at the time.
Time has not corrected this Fake History. However, we have covered all this before in:
The Inquisition Foundation of America's legal systemNow, a reader has pointed out to me the excellent 1994 show BBC has created entitled "
Battle of Mühlberg
The grandson of Ferdinand and Isabella was leader of not only Spain but of the Holy Roman Empire, so determined as he to recreate the vast Christian domains of old.
The decisive military Battle of Muhlberg was won by this leader, Charles V in 1547 AD in trying to prevent to split of Christianity into Catholic and Protestant halves.
However, what Protestants could not win on the battlefield, Jews, with the newly invented printing press, helped Judas-based Protestants win the propaganda wars.
The Gutenberg printing press of the late 1430's had spread to 2,500 European cities by 1500 AD.
The Yellow-Journalism, Judas-based, Jewish-led, propaganda war against Catholic Europe began the year following the Battle of Muhlberg in 1547, but it needed a focus and that focus would be the Jew's favorite hate, the Spanish Inquisition, the institution specifically created to uphold the Catholic faith and especially created to uphold that faith from corruption by Jews.
During the supreme height of Spanish superpower status, under King Philip II, the first real trash against the Inquisition was written in 1567, solidifying the Black Legend.
While this propaganda piece against Christians in Spain was being handed out to everyone in sight, Englishmen I suppose were forgetting that an Englishman could be executed for destroying shrubs in public gardens, or that several of their own queens was beheaded by a kangaroo court appointed by their very own King Henry VIII. If you returned to Germany from banishment, you could have your eyes gouged out. In France, you could be disemboweled for sheep stealing.
It was a relative time for sure, but surely in such a time, lying to God about your faith could be expected to have some dire consequences, greater than destroying a bush or stealing a sheep.
Guess Christians, like whites and men are held to a higher standard -- by Jews.
The power of propaganda is to make people believe Christian churchmen are the sole purveyors of torture, even though the Inquisitors in fact rarely tortured, while other facts are ignored, as in the King of England at the time having people who challenged his rule as both King of England and Pope of the Anglican Church routinely drawn and quartered, as depicted in the movie Braveheart. The Tower of London was not a lookout for sightseers you know.
In fact, the Inquisition was performed by university trained men who looked for facts to support the findings -- almost an enlightenment practice, compared to 300 years of Protestants convicting women of witchcraft on what could be no grounds whatsoever, as there is no such thing as witchcraft.
The Inquisition burned heretics at the stakes, but no witches.
Spain reached the height of superpower status under King Charles V's son Philip II. The Black Legend of the Inquisition would now be directed against Philip. King Henry VIII was more barbaric than Philip II, but Henry's image had to be cleaned up as the leader of the Protestant Reformation, just as the image of Bill Clinton and Barack Obama is cleaned up by Jewish MSM today, while everything George W Bush and Donald Trump does is vilified.
Philip's son was more tolerant toward Protestantism than his father and conveniently dies one year after the publishing of the Black Legend, which plays into the hands of propagandists. This part of the Black Legend was that the father had his own son killed to prevent Spain becoming Protestant.
Per the story, King Philip turns to the Grand Inquisitor to absolve him of killing his son, wherein the Grand Inquisitor intones that the son is just as great a sacrifice for Christianity as was Christ's sacrifice. All a myth, but storytellers get to embellish the facts as they see them, and Jewish publishers make sure you never forget to made up story.
- Don Carlos made into an Opra by Giuseppe Verdi: This play marks [Friedrich] Schiller's entrée into historical drama. Very loosely based on the events surrounding the real Don Carlos of Spain, Schiller's Don Carlos is another republican figure—he attempts to free Flanders from the despotic grip of his father, King Phillip. The Marquis Posa's famous speech to the king proclaims Schiller's belief in personal freedom and democracy.
All defamation needs to be ratcheted up by the Jewish press much as the drip-by-drip accusations against white middle class Americans is ratcheted up by complete fabrications in the name of entertainment like The Handmaid's Tale, and two years after Don Carlos's death, a forgery of what was portrayed to be a document from the Inquisition was published falsely saying that the Inquisition was about to commit genocide against entire populations of Protestants.
Never happened of course, but looking toward England's genocide against Catholic Ireland, English Protestants would hardly be in a position to throw the first stones, if the supposed Spanish genocide were to have ever happened. Remember, it was Queen Elizabeth who was knighting Pirate Francis Drake, making him Sir Francis Drake. Stealing gold from Spanish gold ships being such a Christian virtue you know, worthy of the Queen's blessing.
Spain had the cleanest reputation for killing heretics than any Western European country, but is the only one vilified for doing so.
No more than 3-5 thousand people over the 350 year history of the Inquisition. The estimation for the burning of just witches in the rest of Europe was 150,000 during the same time frame.
How many more as heretics?
You see, it makes perfect sense.
It is far easier for a Catholic king to keep a Catholics in the religion he was born and raised in, than it was for Protestant kings to keep theirs Protestant who had been born and raised Catholic.
Just as we see today where Democrats project their sins, their evils, their manipulations upon Republicans, so too did Protestant Kings had to project against Catholic Kings.
Protestant Kings had to have massive heretic burnings in trying to keep their subjects from reverting to their natural Catholic religion, while Catholic kings had no such problem, since their subjects were born and raised Catholic and remained Catholic. Catholic Kings had little problem keeping their own people Catholic, but were the ones scorned for burning at the stake of heretics.
Same goes for the torture preceding the burning at the stake.
Protestant Kings would use the Jewish propaganda to say the real problem of religious torture and burning heretics lay with Catholic kings.
Had King Ferdinand not gone after a teensy, tiny amount of Jews in prominent positions in society, being heretics to Judaism, by falsely pretending to be Christian conversos, no body at all would be talking about the Spanish Inquisition today.
Only Jews keep this Fake History alive. As they do with the Fake History of the Holocaust.