A Blindlight update - below there is a lot of stuff that's a bit dated. Chris Cantwell, a guy who seems to have Jewish Libertarian approval, is showcased on Jewish media. Is it because he's an important member of the racialist sect? Is it because he's compromised? Is it both?
Also, many will notice my keen interest in Augustus Invictus. I am attracted to him for his lack of pettiness, his seeming honesty and for brutal truths he will say and stand on and won't back down from. He has demonstrated his keen insight as to the problems we face and clearly stated, the "Deep State" is the issue, though he doesn't use that name so much as a reference.
What I am having a problem with him about is his mindless embracing of glorious American history as truth and the OCT narrative put forth pertaining to colonialism where he takes a pretty typical racist stance and labels it "white conquering" and a positive memory to keep.
(I call whites, Banker mercenaries in my counter narrative offering and a true genocide took place against the American Indian as a result. Do you blame the bankers who were also the mouthpiece of the government that encouraged it or do you blame the mercenaries, some who did not volunteer for duty? Blindlight would claim the true narrative and the advantageous one for us is to give full credit to the Jew and the supportive rich race for the accomplishment and remember, Jews masquerade as White all the time to hurt the White race).
The alarmingly conservative look of Augustus Invictus (considering who he really is)
Further issues appear where he, seemingly, is oblivious to the possibility that all the false flags resulting in WWE like promotions of certain issues, he takes at face value. He actually claimed "Paris" was a motivating moment for him to get up and really get serious.
Update- New info Blindlight has gathered makes the meaning of his Paris statement much less clear and Blindlight must admit this below broadcast, concerning it, is an impressive response. He may be side-stepping the issue of false flags in vagueries intentionally left in place for reasons not at my disposal to discern
Look, I just don't buy this obliviousness over and over where no doubts are raised and where a discerning person, not a slave to the status quo, would. If they are false flags, they are essential to confront for that changes who the enemy was in each narrative.
He proclaims to want to get to the truth but pretends there is only one truth here, the stories promoted as fact by the MAINSTREAM MEDIA. Interestingly, when interviewed by SPLC reporter, Rachel Janik, she quizzes him about Jews and the holocaust but not 911 or Sandy Hook.
Folks if you disbelieve the holocaust narrative, you are actually saying the event was staged.
It continues to be amazing to Blindlight that this scrutiny is approved in the racialist movement (seemingly coordinated even) but things like Sandy Hook, Las Vegas or Paris are "off limits" to talk about.
Obviously, the holocaust dwarfs all other events including 911 as far as pulling off successfully as a hoax. Once it is acknowledged and Invictus avoided her question on it in such a way that he's at minimum skeptical, that the holocaust is a hoax, for credibilities sake, all other goofy mass murders and such must be looked at carefully.
Again, Invictus pretends there is nothing to look at. The fact he is a politician doesn't work because he's acting in such a way about many other issues to not be able to make the claim of "political suicide" if he were honest.
For instance, he's literally telling everyone to arm themselves and get ready to fight their government while running for office (Senator). He publicized the fact that he sacrificed a goat to the goddess of his pagan religion.
These egregious omissions only sell by the cover of the fact the whole racialist right are omitting false frag scrutiny as a must do requirement. Perplexing to say the least.
Just thought I'd share these thoughts and have a good evening
Note Stormer operative , I forget his name (Azzamor?), literally slurring minorities for the Jew camera. This is a leader, to remind! Great public relations for the White Race! "The problem is Jewish communists and criminal niggers!" he says.
Another state: "We're showing to this parasitic class of non-White vermin!" and no, you can't make this stuff up. Azzmador seems to be assigned to assure the public that White racialists are the hate mongers Vice and all the others claim them to be.
Blindlight would caution against making statements like that, that can be used as sound bites against you to show people, trying to make up their minds about whether they like you or not, what you are made of. Since this example is actually an MO (especially @stormer) Blindlight must ask whose side are they really on?
WHAT IS THE ADVANTAGE OF SOUND BITE PROVOCATEUR TRASH TALKING OF NON-WHITES FOR THE HBO (JEWISH) CAMERA?
Takeaway from first interview with Cantwell who is Jewish enough to make non-racialist Jews capable of recommending his website (I noticed in a google search):
As standard policy, when Oklahoma City and South Carolina are brought up as examples of white terrorism, this is not challenged (Blindlight asserts they were both false flag events to target whites as the enemy). Seemingly, this should be something worth promoting for the White race?
At the end Cantwell unbelievably accepts the covert intel op that claimed a fat white woman had a heart attack and defended the patsy of panicking due to belligerant behavior by the alt-left (Charlottesville). Is that preferrable to mentioning the very real possibility that the claimed driver was not the driver but the patsy?
Does that not then imply the Deep State was targetting White Nationalists with false flag terror, an MO noted by this website since it opened it's doors February of 2014? Oh yeah, Racialists don't like to doubt MSM narratives cause they will look stupid (or that's what the leaders claim). Folks, you can't expose the NWO by humoring those who believe it's misdirection so as not to hurt feelz. Has everyone forgotten the significance of 911 and what it meant? Let me spell it out for you
WE ARE THE ENEMY WHO MUST BE LIED TO SO THEY CAN DO WHAT THEY WANT (AND IF A FEW NEED TO DIE, WHO CARES!)
This white movement is designed to fail because the outcome was settled in Vince McMahon's "War Room" a long time ago LOOK FOR LEADERS WHO DON'T WORK FOR HIM!
For what enemy opponent, let's his enemy ride in their van to the scene of action to show them what good guys they are? White racialists have had this strategy from day one of their existence. Somehow they will do or say something to the Jew media that gets the executives to totally change their outlook about who they are filming and chart a new course filled with brotherly love for the white resistor? Nada!
John deNugent on almost every article, almost everyday, that he writes, is reposting his less than three hours of fame where he muttered words that the Jew media distorted to market their own campaign against the white race. He considers it a win for him or he wouldn't repost it but was it a win for us? You would be delusional to think so.
And as we look back on the results, did Chris Cantwell's welcoming arms give the RACIALIST RIGHT a door with a welcome mat placed in front of it or did he give them his face that HBO could then write "THE FACE OF HATE" over?