Is "Non-Aligned Media aligned with the Fabian Society on the sleigh?

Brandon MartinezI originally just posted the heart of this material on my home page but due to it's increasing significance as I stumble into more demonstrations of co-option, I have decided to make a permanent article. This concerns one of my  earliest assignments that started about eighteen months ago when I learned Zander Fuerza had disappeared and then morphed into Brandon Martinez.

I have covered, aplenty, the situations that led to this, from the fake confrontation with Mike DeLaney, to the disowning of all his posts as Zander Fuerza at ZionCrimeFactory, to blaming WN pressure for mind controlling him into the cult of Hitler worship which the fake fight over ZCF helped supposedly break the spell of. You will never hear Brandon Martinez say a good word about Hitler, anymore. You will never hear Brandon Martinez say a good word about Trump and you will never hear Brandon Martinez say a good word about Putin

For a while, I viewed Martinez's Putin obsession as provocateurish in nature but it was just a gut feeling. I thought he was making a fairly good case. He was crediting his supposed non-alignment with an ability to see Putin without alternative media rose colored glasses on. He was actually implying that all those who liked Putin must be compromised or dupes. It smelled funny but that is all that I could figure.

***I was forced to address his behavior once it became clear to me that as Brandon Martinez maligns and defames those for having Putin bias, Martinez links research from high level western think tank members who have a clear anti-Putin bias. Pretty much all the claims he makes against a Johnsonwhom this linked article of his is addressing, can be said about his own linked sources.
Very interesting to see a person, formerly known as ZCF, a guy that noted A. Jones was obviously compromised because of all his appearances on the MSM and therefore "kosher", become Brandon Martinez middleman for Fabian society think tank authors and professors. But let's get the details***

Again, this week, Zander goes off on a Putin rampage with six articles in a row posted negatively about him and then I caught him. I caught Martinez's misdirection in the act. When Brandon gave his "unbiased" assessment of Putin (that no one else is willing to give you) while demonizing the motives or the scholarship of those with favorable views of the Russian leader, he made a mistake that he has probably made over and over but  I didn't catch till now.

His corroboration links, on the two occasions I decided to scrutinize them closely, both came from NWO friendly, western sources. Think drinking buddies  of Henry Kissinger types and you will be close.  It came in regards to his article attack against Dr. Raphael Mathew Johnson, Martinez claims, is guilty of Russophilia and  Putin aggrandizement.

To a non-expert such as myself, Martinez's claims sounded like they may have merit. It was just the venom and partisanship with which Zander went about his attacks, for he claims to be "Non-aligned", that had me continually cautious about his true motives Then he gave two links, done in such a way to hide the source from most  followers of Zander's work while receiving the propaganda. It has the smell of "tricky, sneaky Jew" on it, this maneuver does.

The first instance seemed innocent enough. Brandon linked these words, "have met mysterious and violent deaths" to an article by Amy Knight. Amy's Wikipedia profile, which in and of itself gives her MSM credibility, says this:

Amy Knight

Amy KnightFrom Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Amy W. Knight (born July 10, 1946) is an American historian of the Soviet Union and Russia.[1] She has been described by The New York Times as "the West's foremost scholar" of the KGB.[2]

Amy Knight was born in Chicago in 1946. She gained a Bachelor of Arts (BA) at the University of Michigan. She went on to gain a Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) in Russian politics at the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) in 1977.[3] She taught at the LSE, the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies at Johns Hopkins UniversityGeorge Washington University and at Carleton University.[2][3] She also worked for eighteen years at the U.S. Library of Congress as a specialist in Russian and Soviet affairs.[3][4] Knight also writes for The New York Review of BooksThe Times Literary Supplement and The Globe and Mail.[1]

In 1993–94, she was a fellow at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.

***Dawisha, below, not only went to the same Fabian school as Mrs. Knight (London School of Economics and Political Science) but has ties to the WOODROW WILSON CENTER (1)as well. Very coincidental! Brandon?***


***If you follow the link of "London School of Economics", you will find out that this institution was started by and is connected to "The Fabian Society". You really don't need that info though. Just look at all the high profile folks and institutions she is connected to. Below, I will have an article reproduced by  Chris Bollyn of 911 fame. He does not  trust Mrs. Knight and one reason is her husband is a high-profile illuminati banker from Canada, no less, Brandon's country. He also complains of her anti-Russian bias mixed with her inability to provide facts for many of the claims she makes.
This becomes more interesting because this is exactly Brandon's complaint about the supposed Putin cult. So Brandon complains about the bias of the Putin cult while providing you for his own back-up Illuminatti approved, go to, western media sources.

Con the goy much Brandon?

Let's look at the great article by Bollyn and then I will mention the other biased source he uses and mind you, these are the only two I checked!

Anti-Russia Propaganda: Where Does It Take Us?

November 20, 2014

I was surprised to find an article on the website of the New York Review of Books about the recently released photos that allegedly show a fighter jet firing a missile at Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 over the Ukraine last July.

The article by Amy Knight is blatant propaganda in which she blames Russia for the downing of MH17 without providing any evidence.  Where is such anti-Russian propaganda meant to take us? 

The article, written by Amy Knight, is entitled “Flight MH17: Will Russia Get Away With It?” As the title suggests, the article is accusatory and blames the Russian government for the civil war in the Ukraine, which was actually precipitated by a U.S.-led coup d’étatthat installed an anti-Russian government in a nation with a large Russian-speaking population. 

The article begins with an unproven claim that a large number of Russian military convoys invaded the Ukraine last week:

Following the entry of more than 120 Russian military convoys into Ukraine last week, the US and its European allies appear to have reached a turning point in their response to the Ukrainian conflict.

Knight goes on to blame the Kremlin for being involved in the shooting down of Malaysia Airlines MH17, a very serious accusation to make - without providing any evidence:

Judging from Russia’s recent military incursions in Ukraine—and its increasingly provocative and bellicose actions elsewhere in the world—the Kremlin apparently is assuming that the US and its allies will not pursue harsher measures to restrain Putin. This should not come as a surprise. When was the last time a country provided the weapon used to shoot down a passenger jet in a neighboring country, with impunity?

She also addresses the photographs that were shown on Russia’s Channel One on November 14, 2014, which she dismisses as fake:

Just last weekend, a program on Russian Channel One again produced images to show that a Ukrainian fighter plane was near MH17 just before the crash. However, it did not take long for Russian commentators on social media to determine that the photographs were fakes.

I find it very interesting that when it comes to debunking these photos people like Amy Knight take the opinions of “Russian commentators on social media” seriously, while similar American commentators - with professional credentials - who have presented solid evidence that the government/media version of 9-11 is nothing but a pack of lies are completely ignored by her and the media outlets she writes for.

Working on her utterly baseless accusations against Russia, Knight concludes that the West should apply tougher sanctions on the Kremlin and the Russian leader, Vladimir Putin:

Western leaders must keep in mind the lesson of Malaysian Flight MH17—that left undeterred, there is little the Kremlin won’t do in its efforts to assert its dominance over the former Soviet empire. As Ukrainian Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk observed last week: “[Putin] is testing the ground. He will move as far as the world will allow him.”


Amy W. Knight (born 1946, Chicago) is described as an American historian of the Soviet Union and Russia.

This article is an egregious example of the vicious anti-Russian propaganda found in the controlled media in the West. So, who is Amy Knight, this irresponsible propagandist who makes serious accusations against Russia and then encourages the West to take action based on her assumptions of Russian guilt?

The New York Review of Books offers a very brief biographical sketch of Amy Knight:

Amy Knight is a former Woodrow Wilson fellow. Her books include Who Killed Kirov: The Kremlin’s Greatest Mystery, Spies Without Cloaks: The KGB’s Successors, and How the Cold War Began: The Igor Gouzenko Affair and the Hunt for Soviet Spies.

Wikipedia says that she was born in 1946 and is an American historian of the Soviet Union and Russia. She studied Russian politics at the London School of Economics and Political Science and went on to teach there. It adds that Knight has been described by The New York Times as "the West's foremost scholar" of the KGB and that she and her husband Malcolm have three children.

***The most as far as reference either husband and wife will make to the other is a first name reference if that. Malcolm's Wikipedia page doesn't even mention his family. Apparently, not only Brandon has something to hide but Amy and Malcolm do as well. Amy, don't want to let the proles know your opinions might  correlate to what is good for hubby and lower your credibility? Of course the MSM helps cover just like the MSM II covers for Brandon's previous life as ZCF***

So, I asked, who is Malcolm Knight, the husband of the “West’s foremost scholar” on the KGB? Well, Malcolm Knight is certainly no slouch either. He is a Canadian who was the former Senior Deputy Governor of the Bank of Canada (1999-2003) and General Manager and chief executive officer of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) from April 2003 until September 2008.  The CEO of the BIS is like being the Capo di tutti capi or "boss of all bosses" of the network of global banksters.

Malcolm Knight was Canada's central banker who then served as CEO of the Bank of International Settlements.

Malcolm Knight was the first person from outside Europe to hold this senior executive position at the BIS in Basel, Switzerland. He went on to serve as Vice Chairman of Deutsche Bank Global Group, based in New York, from October 2008 to March 2012.

Among other duties, Knight was a member of the Financial Stability Forum (now the Financial Stability Board), reporting to the G-8 and G-20 finance ministers on vulnerabilities in the international financial system from 2003 to 2008. Note that his position as an advisor on the “vulnerabilities in the international financial system” ended in 2008, the year of the trillion-dollar bailout and global financial collapse caused by the unbridled greed of “banksters”.


Some might ask, does it really matter that this anti-Russia propagandist Amy Knight is married to one of the top central bankers in the world? 

Well, of course, it does. The anti-Russia propaganda campaign is a fundamental part of the economic war against Russia. Vladimir Putin and Russia have successfully resisted the global gangsterism of the international bankers, their controlled media, and the spineless politicians who serve them.  Thanks to the level-headed Vladimir Putin and his brilliant foreign minister Sergey Lavrov we have already avoided several wars in the Middle East.

If Amy Knight were truly a serious scholar on Russia, she would not make such serious accusations against the Kremlin without providing solid evidence to support her charges. The fact that she makes such allegations without providing any evidence indicates that she is working as a propagandist to sway public opinion against Vladimir Putin and Russia. This is extremely irresponsible and reckless because it could very well lead to war, which is exactly the way banksters do it. 

So, does it matter? Remember that it was very similar baseless allegations about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction, made by Judith Miller of the New York Times, that took us to war in Iraq in 2003. That war of aggression wound up lasting a decade, cost our nation trillions of dollars and destroyed an untold number of lives. 

Then think for a minute about where this anti-Russian propaganda campaign is meant to lead us and ask yourself if it’s worth resisting the lies.

Sources:  Amy Knight, Wikipedia, November 20, 2014

Biographical Note for Malcolm D. Knight, Bank of International Settlements, November 20, 2014

"Flight MH17: Will Russia Get Away With It?" by Amy Knight, New York Review of Books, November 19, 2014

Malcolm Knight, Wikipedia, November 20, 2014

"Russia Under Attack" by Christopher Bollyn, February 15, 2014

"The Downing of MH17 - Is Israel Involved?" by Christopher Bollyn, Updated August 13, 2014

"Understanding the Crisis in Ukraine" by Christopher Bollyn, Updated May 11, 2014

White Pages listings for Malcolm D. and Amy W. Knight in Summit, NJ 


Karen Dawisha headshot.pngSo going on down this hit piece Brandon put out, right after Amy Knight is linked, Brandon goes to a youtube video that credits this woman for all the information


Early life and education[edit]

She received a bachelor's degree from Lancaster University and a Ph.D. from the London School of Economics.[5]

Putin's Kleptocracy[edit]

Dawisha's latest book, Putin's Kleptocracy: Who Owns Russia? (Simon & Schuster, 2014) has been called "a who's who of the people on the sanctions lists drawn up by America and the EU".[6] It chronicles the rise of Vladimir Putin during his time in St. Petersburg in the 1990s.


Karen Dawisha has served as an advisor to the British House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee and as an International Affairs Fellow of the Council on Foreign Relations, and she was a member of the Policy Planning Staff and the Bureau of Political-Military Affairs of the U.S. State Department (1985-7). Until the summer of 2000, she was a Professor in the Department of Government and Politics at the University of Maryland and had served as the Director of its Center for the Study of Post-Communist Societies. In 2014, Dawisha received considerable attention for her work detailing the rise and crimes of Vladimir Putin.


*** I wouldn't have realize the connection but the narrator of the video, just below, verbally recognizes that all of his info comes from Miss Dawisha...To quote the moderator of this video, "In this 9 part series, I'll share with you what I have learned researching Putin, MAINLY from the massively important book, 'Putin's Kleptocracy' an impeccably researched investigation into how Putin became so powerful written by foreign affairs professor Karen Dawisha (Fabian Society, CFR)".
Ok, I'll play devil's advocate here. Why would a videographer make a video off an author's book unless it was some sort of prearranged agreement? How does he know her research is impeccable and unbiased? I mean, it's not like the west hasn't been demonizing Russia  under Putin non-stop! Would you expect any different here from an onboard CFR member, part of the western intelligentsia?
Oh, Brandon is clever, he posted the 4th part of the video which doesn't make clear that this videographer is a  CFR stooge for Dawisha. Sorry that Brandon. Am I too observant? Unfortunately, the more you look into Brandon's claim of Non-Alignment, the more you see it's Jewish misdirection, but good try bros!

By the way, she's tied to the FABIAN SOCIETY as well as Amy Knight and "THE WOODROW WILSON CENTER FOR RICH ASSHOLES" so Brandon is consistent on his sources anyway....Ultimately, Brandon pulls another sleight of hand with his non-aligned media claim. It seems that what he does is regurgitate MSM talking points in a way that sounds like resistance and truth telling but is really just attempting to herd his followers towards the objectives and goals of the NWO. Just listen to how his recommended videos demonize everything about Putin as if he is pure Hitler and you will ultimately realize how aligned with the western think tanks Non-Aligned Media actually is


I watched the 6 video playlist on Putin that Bryce and Brenden Plank of "The Daily Conversation" had on their you-tube channel. I would compare the experience to one of going to "The Daily Stormer" and looking up their race section and reading negative content about Blacks and Arabs but simply change the name to Putin and you should understand what it was like. I basically learned that Putin had no redeemable traits and was evil through and through. Like Stormer sees all blacks and Muslims!
I saw that they had a ten minute video on how Israel came into being. I can tell you they are as mainstream as you can get. Jews never do anything wrong, Arabs make their own bed and hate to lie in it. It bolsters my case that Brandon is totally fake resistance, aligned with the powers that be and that is no "non-alignment" at all

Brandon, wondering if this will wake the goy up to you. One more nail in the coffin son! and it couldn't happen to a more deserving Jew bitch!

Read 8193 times Last modified on Saturday, 17 December 2016 14:04


Always remember the limits which goys set for themselves. Their thinking has stagnated within these limits, and they are unable to go beyond them. Therein lies their misfortune and our advantage. Speak and act in a way which their morality and their concepts do not permit.

Do things which seem to them to be impossible and incredible. They will not believe that you are capable of words and actions of which they are not capable. 

Speak and act in a way which is confident, energetic, aggressive, discouraging and stunning. Produce more noise and oral trumpery, and say more things which are incomprehensible and pseudo-scientific. | This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.


We have 161 guests and no members online

Chat - log-in