Always remember the limits which goys set for themselves. Their thinking has stagnated within these limits, and they are unable to go beyond them. Therein lies their misfortune and our advantage. Speak and act in a way which their morality and their concepts do not permit.

Do things which seem to them to be impossible and incredible. They will not believe that you are capable of words and actions of which they are not capable. 

Speak and act in a way which is confident, energetic, aggressive, discouraging and stunning. Produce more noise and oral trumpery, and say more things which are incomprehensible and pseudo-scientific.



Image result for PutinRethinking Putin: A Talk by Professor Stephen F. Cohen

Blindlight recommends that Cohen's Jewish reference as to Jewish welfare, that implies Jews didn't have it very good during the Stalin era, must be salted with heavy grains. Few Jews will take responsibility for what the counter movement to the MSM certainly knows was a Jewish takeover of Russia in the 20's

Also,  while Blindlight doesn't look to Putin as some sort of savior,  he is left bewildered as to why folks like Renegade, Brandon Martinez and Brendon O'Connell spend so much time demonizing him (Blindlight calls it the Putin Hate Cult). 

He is forced to wonder if neo-cons control them behind the scenes, it's so in your face, for to over react to one aspect of the Jew World Order, draws a reader easily into being taken in by the over all psyop that demands we be drawn in.

Blindlight recommends arms length analysis and the realization that Western powers actions have forced Putin to react to our aggression as evidenced by USA world military base count that surrounds Russia). Jewish rule does depend on endless unnecessary conflicts and demonization of others makes that conflict more likely and good for Jews

Thursday, 08 February 2018 01:59

3rd Tier OP Ideology paper

After a local Pennsylvania political council included a self-identified white nationalist on its scheduled debate panel, a Republican candidate for Congress led a call to deplatform him and proponents of white identity politics generally. Other conservative political boosters amplified his signal in the regional press, pejoratively insisting that respectable political discourse lacks space for those whose ideological starting point is a shared white identity.

Image result for National Policy InstituteBlindlight note - Richard Spencer's fake resistance has suffered an at minimal, temporary setback with the exposure that Eli Mosley has been mis-representing himself. This site is sure it was well known and the real issue is "now the goyim know" so fake remedies are thus in order

Tuesday, 06 February 2018 01:24

Is it News or a Commercial?

 Is it News or a Commercial?

Lisa Havens gives us a good example on how resistance advocacy can be used to sell products. THe video starts off with a heads-up on some spy bill being renewed which then turned out to be a great segway into promoting a VPN sponsor she has. When one looks below the video one gets an idea what Lisa's primary mission in life is

behindthecurtainIsraeli media courting  the alt-right behind the American curtain?Israeli media is quietly supporting controlled anti_semites such as Jarod Taylor and Andrew Anglin. A month or two ago, a Jewish news program interviewed Andrew Anglin ((translated to Hebrew for the audience) and acted like he was a rock star. Here again, this video is made directly to communicate in a positive fashion, with Jarod Taylor


The fact is Jews don't mind anti-Semites if they are "controlled". Being controlled is the key because after enlisting the attention of the group gentle herding may be done to suit the eternal slavemasters

Please note, this warm fuzzy is being withheld from the American public, I assume, because, politically, it is better for Jews to sell Anglin -Taylor as evil NAZIs here

Monday, 05 February 2018 01:30

CASE STUDY in Disinfo by Lana Lokteff

In the Video below, Lana Lokteff out does herself.

Jews must always maintain their “Alliances with Blacks”, NO matter what and never sully their reputation with their supporting cast.

Lana Lokteff a Jewess is sanitizing Margaret Sanger. Interestingly, in the mid and late 1990’s Planned Parenthood Officials themselves said “Sanger ‘s Racial statements & positions of her time are embarrassing. Sanger, like Lana are Jewess ‘ and they stick together. Lana is full of shit, and as cheap as her clothing line and as fraudulent as Red Ice’s so called “Hack” of course (as Lana says in the Video) Sanger was anti-Nazi in 1939, she was a Jewess.


Sunday, 04 February 2018 19:07

Lasha Darkmoon's name is Anne?

Image result for Nina RosenwaldLasha Darkmoon's name is Anne?

Image result for Nina RosenwaldLasha Darkmoon's site seems to be no more.  One of her regular publishers has added something to the link to her articles there. Her first name

(Perhaps to hide the fact she is Nina Rosenwald?)

Lasha (Real name: Anne) Darkmoon



Perhaps this line in Wiki-spooks helps explain why she is controlled as Lasha takes the politically expedient position to claim "Manchester" wasn't staged

Dr. 'Lasha Darkmoon' is the pen name of an Anglo/US journalist and author. She is anti-pornography, believing it is especially corrupting of children.[1] Her writings are published by TheTruthSeeker. She is aware of the reality of recent false flag attacks, but highly doubtful of claims of those who suggest the 2017 Westminster attack was staged.[2]


The 2017 Westminster attack occurred on 22 March 2017, on Westminster Bridge and the palace of Westminster, central London. After the attack, Amber Rudd attempted to suggest that it demonstrated that the UK intelligence agencies needed more mass surveillance capabilities and that encryption should be prohibited.[1] On 24th March, Lasha Darkmoon published a pictorial summary of the commercially-controlled media accounts, not inconsistent with the idea of a "lone nut".

Lasha demonstrated a pretty typical limited hangout MO here using her 911 credentials, to basically sell the government story and to place the burden of proof to be on our side and until then, believe the big brother account to be true. 

As far as I’m concerned, those who wish to see this as a false flag attack are perfectly entitled to do so, but hopefully they will soon come up with some convincing evidence for their theories. Suspicion and idle chatter do not, in my humble opinion, add up to substantive proof.

An Eyewitness Account
At about 2.45pm yesterday I looked out of my office window at the Palace of Westminster. There had been a bang – sounded like a crash. As we now know, a car had smashed into the side-railings of Parliament’s New Palace Yard and several innocents had been hurt. That I did not see. But the rest I did.
I work in an office under Big Ben. It offers a fine view normally – but yesterday a view of death, a vile vista of a violence we might wish to call medieval but is sadly all too 21st century. Normality can be snuffed out in seconds.
It had been a routine Wednesday: a lively enough prime minister’s questions…. Outside it was a lovely spring day. In the middle of New Palace Yard is a fountain. Its jetting water glittered in the sunlight. Tourists took Big Ben snapshots and posed by the statue of Winston Churchill.
After the bang, at first, came nothing but a few shouts. Then a sound of panicked screams – from pedestrians running, some looking backwards in alarm as they fled west towards the Abbey. A second later I saw him: a thickset man in dark clothes, possibly 40 or 50 years old, with something in his hand. Was it a sawn broom handle? A knife?
From my high vantage point, about 100 yards or so from the yard’s open gates, I saw the following unfold, as though in slow motion.
Two uniformed police in hi-viz jackets challenged the man in black. There was a scuffle. One policeman disengaged himself. The other fell against a crash barrier and went to the ground. The attacker set about him, one arm plunging in and out.
Perhaps two seconds later the attacker loped further into the parliamentary estate, heading towards a cafe used by the public. I could see that other police had summoned help. Two plainclothes men with handguns – I think it was two – approached him. They adopted a shooting stance and I heard shouts. The attacker did not seem to heed those shouts. He kept moving towards them, his gait that of a weary marathon runner. Two. No, three crisp shots. That was all. The attacker fell instantly.
The police reaction had been fast. The men who fired the shots conducted themselves tidily, without melodrama, certainly without any triumph. One policeman was down. Almost at once, medical attention was given, both to the fallen policeman and the attacker.
The Palace of Westminster has been sealed. Maybe it should have been better sealed beforehand…. Our own safety is but a sigh on the breeze. What matters to history – a history running back to Norman times, is the principle of parliamentary freedom…. We stand solid. We stand proud. And our police and armed forces defend us, even with their own lives, as I saw happen yesterday. (This last paragraph looks more like a government press release to bolster the morale of the troops, imo, falls into made up witness category until substantially proved otherwise - BL)

Does this look to you like a false flag attack? Are all these crisis actors? Is the author of this moving account part of the scam? I  must leave that to others to decide. In accordance with my nature, I remain a neutral agnostic and self-confessed ignoramus, prepared to swing either way as the picture becomes clearer.

(BL reaction -  Anne has all but admitted she is selling the government OCT here, but then concludes she is agnostic? Do her readers ever hold her feet to the fire on anything?)


***"I have debunked that viewpoint by simply saying, it is not our responsibility to believe an entity or a person who chronically lies and in fact, it is our duty to have extreme doubts about anything they say until the "review process" isn't camouflaged around the need for state secrets and we can get back routine double checking methods which can verify the incidents for ourselves

When Lasha reposts ver batim , a government witnesses report about what he saw, sheesh, we are crazy to assume these were  random valid witness to the event with the history recently surrounding false flags and staged crisis actors. 

It would seem Lasha is trying to normalize hard to believe events as being believable and of course this is why 3rd tier dissent is in place 

Protocols 12-14

11. In the third rank
we shall set up our own,
to all appearance, off position,
in at least one of its organs,
will present what looks like the very antipodes to us.
Our real opponents at heart
will accept this simulated opposition as their own
and will show us their cards.

12. All our newspapers will be of all possible complexions -
even anarchical -
for so long, of course,
as the constitution exists ....

Like the Indian idol "Vishnu"
they will have a hundred hands,
and every one of them
will have a finger on any one of the public opinions
as required.

When a pulse quickens
these hands will lead opinion
in the direction of our aims,
for an excited patient loses all power of judgment
and easily yields to suggestion.

Those fools
who will think they are repeating the opinion of a newspaper
of their own camp
will be repeating our opinion
or any opinion that seems desirable for us.

In the vain belief
that they are following the organ of their party
they will, in fact,
follow the flag which we hang out for them.

- Blindlight


An Email exchange reaction to the below interview between Rebel Media and Paul Nehlen, much of it on the JQ

Let's find a better way!




Well, arguments like Nehlen was having over what is a Jew must be avoided because we don’t have the time needed to reeducate the audience on the options here in an antagonist environment and the antagonists have the advantage of prior brainwashing.

 This is why initially, we have to define all this on our terms where we set the ground rules, not on theirs.

Perhaps official debates on the JQ could involve uninterrupted statements of important points to make. What seemed clear was that the interviewer liked interrupting Nehlen’s train of thought. I really don’t think it’s a good idea to  define the JQ on enemy radio beyond the problem of them (the Jews) setting up powerful groups that have way too much influence that is a fact good for Jews and bad for goyim

 I know I would avoid going to their house (accept an invitation) because I would have to deal with prior brainwashing in all the  areas from which I make presumptions and convince the audience of the validity of doing so in a short periord of time while being harrassed in the attemptand yelled at.

  It’s why I think of myself as an ideology and not a movement. An ideology that a movement may utilize or not as they deal with practical implementing of the saving of our race and homeland
Page 4 of 50