Image result for Nina RosenwaldLasha Darkmoon's name is Anne?

Image result for Nina RosenwaldLasha Darkmoon's site seems to be no more.  One of her regular publishers has added something to the link to her articles there. Her first name

(Perhaps to hide the fact she is Nina Rosenwald?)

Lasha (Real name: Anne) Darkmoon



Perhaps this line in Wiki-spooks helps explain why she is controlled as Lasha takes the politically expedient position to claim "Manchester" wasn't staged

Dr. 'Lasha Darkmoon' is the pen name of an Anglo/US journalist and author. She is anti-pornography, believing it is especially corrupting of children.[1] Her writings are published by TheTruthSeeker. She is aware of the reality of recent false flag attacks, but highly doubtful of claims of those who suggest the 2017 Westminster attack was staged.[2]


The 2017 Westminster attack occurred on 22 March 2017, on Westminster Bridge and the palace of Westminster, central London. After the attack, Amber Rudd attempted to suggest that it demonstrated that the UK intelligence agencies needed more mass surveillance capabilities and that encryption should be prohibited.[1] On 24th March, Lasha Darkmoon published a pictorial summary of the commercially-controlled media accounts, not inconsistent with the idea of a "lone nut".

Lasha demonstrated a pretty typical limited hangout MO here using her 911 credentials, to basically sell the government story and to place the burden of proof to be on our side and until then, believe the big brother account to be true. 

As far as I’m concerned, those who wish to see this as a false flag attack are perfectly entitled to do so, but hopefully they will soon come up with some convincing evidence for their theories. Suspicion and idle chatter do not, in my humble opinion, add up to substantive proof.

An Eyewitness Account
At about 2.45pm yesterday I looked out of my office window at the Palace of Westminster. There had been a bang – sounded like a crash. As we now know, a car had smashed into the side-railings of Parliament’s New Palace Yard and several innocents had been hurt. That I did not see. But the rest I did.
I work in an office under Big Ben. It offers a fine view normally – but yesterday a view of death, a vile vista of a violence we might wish to call medieval but is sadly all too 21st century. Normality can be snuffed out in seconds.
It had been a routine Wednesday: a lively enough prime minister’s questions…. Outside it was a lovely spring day. In the middle of New Palace Yard is a fountain. Its jetting water glittered in the sunlight. Tourists took Big Ben snapshots and posed by the statue of Winston Churchill.
After the bang, at first, came nothing but a few shouts. Then a sound of panicked screams – from pedestrians running, some looking backwards in alarm as they fled west towards the Abbey. A second later I saw him: a thickset man in dark clothes, possibly 40 or 50 years old, with something in his hand. Was it a sawn broom handle? A knife?
From my high vantage point, about 100 yards or so from the yard’s open gates, I saw the following unfold, as though in slow motion.
Two uniformed police in hi-viz jackets challenged the man in black. There was a scuffle. One policeman disengaged himself. The other fell against a crash barrier and went to the ground. The attacker set about him, one arm plunging in and out.
Perhaps two seconds later the attacker loped further into the parliamentary estate, heading towards a cafe used by the public. I could see that other police had summoned help. Two plainclothes men with handguns – I think it was two – approached him. They adopted a shooting stance and I heard shouts. The attacker did not seem to heed those shouts. He kept moving towards them, his gait that of a weary marathon runner. Two. No, three crisp shots. That was all. The attacker fell instantly.
The police reaction had been fast. The men who fired the shots conducted themselves tidily, without melodrama, certainly without any triumph. One policeman was down. Almost at once, medical attention was given, both to the fallen policeman and the attacker.
The Palace of Westminster has been sealed. Maybe it should have been better sealed beforehand…. Our own safety is but a sigh on the breeze. What matters to history – a history running back to Norman times, is the principle of parliamentary freedom…. We stand solid. We stand proud. And our police and armed forces defend us, even with their own lives, as I saw happen yesterday. (This last paragraph looks more like a government press release to bolster the morale of the troops, imo, falls into made up witness category until substantially proved otherwise - BL)

Does this look to you like a false flag attack? Are all these crisis actors? Is the author of this moving account part of the scam? I  must leave that to others to decide. In accordance with my nature, I remain a neutral agnostic and self-confessed ignoramus, prepared to swing either way as the picture becomes clearer.

(BL reaction -  Anne has all but admitted she is selling the government OCT here, but then concludes she is agnostic? Do her readers ever hold her feet to the fire on anything?)


***"I have debunked that viewpoint by simply saying, it is not our responsibility to believe an entity or a person who chronically lies and in fact, it is our duty to have extreme doubts about anything they say until the "review process" isn't camouflaged around the need for state secrets and we can get back routine double checking methods which can verify the incidents for ourselves

When Lasha reposts ver batim , a government witnesses report about what he saw, sheesh, we are crazy to assume these were  random valid witness to the event with the history recently surrounding false flags and staged crisis actors. 

It would seem Lasha is trying to normalize hard to believe events as being believable and of course this is why 3rd tier dissent is in place 

Protocols 12-14

11. In the third rank
we shall set up our own,
to all appearance, off position,
in at least one of its organs,
will present what looks like the very antipodes to us.
Our real opponents at heart
will accept this simulated opposition as their own
and will show us their cards.

12. All our newspapers will be of all possible complexions -
even anarchical -
for so long, of course,
as the constitution exists ....

Like the Indian idol "Vishnu"
they will have a hundred hands,
and every one of them
will have a finger on any one of the public opinions
as required.

When a pulse quickens
these hands will lead opinion
in the direction of our aims,
for an excited patient loses all power of judgment
and easily yields to suggestion.

Those fools
who will think they are repeating the opinion of a newspaper
of their own camp
will be repeating our opinion
or any opinion that seems desirable for us.

In the vain belief
that they are following the organ of their party
they will, in fact,
follow the flag which we hang out for them.

- Blindlight


Read 4771 times Last modified on Monday, 05 February 2018 15:23


Always remember the limits which goys set for themselves. Their thinking has stagnated within these limits, and they are unable to go beyond them. Therein lies their misfortune and our advantage. Speak and act in a way which their morality and their concepts do not permit.

Do things which seem to them to be impossible and incredible. They will not believe that you are capable of words and actions of which they are not capable. 

Speak and act in a way which is confident, energetic, aggressive, discouraging and stunning. Produce more noise and oral trumpery, and say more things which are incomprehensible and pseudo-scientific.