An Email exchange reaction to the below interview between Rebel Media and Paul Nehlen, much of it on the JQ
Let's find a better way!
Well, arguments like Nehlen was having over what is a Jew must be avoided because we don’t have the time needed to reeducate the audience on the options here in an antagonist environment and the antagonists have the advantage of prior brainwashing.
This is why initially, we have to define all this on our terms where we set the ground rules, not on theirs.
Perhaps official debates on the JQ could involve uninterrupted statements of important points to make. What seemed clear was that the interviewer liked interrupting Nehlen’s train of thought. I really don’t think it’s a good idea to define the JQ on enemy radio beyond the problem of them (the Jews) setting up powerful groups that have way too much influence that is a fact good for Jews and bad for goyim
I know I would avoid going to their house (accept an invitation) because I would have to deal with prior brainwashing in all the areas from which I make presumptions and convince the audience of the validity of doing so in a short periord of time while being harrassed in the attemptand yelled at.