Working Within the JWO or seeking Removal, How to Tell the Difference-(Updated!)
This article idea was born off the writing of these other two articles. Resisting the NWO Does Not Include Fighting For First Dibs on Jew Crumbs and My Theory on the Abrahamic Religions-Are They a JWO Controlling Mechanism?. The topics dealt with are about when the JWO really began in its present form and the temptation promoted in the other article of accepting the JWO as a fact and maneuvering for higher status within the op as opposed to fighting it
The problem with that, though, is many of these folks maneuvering for higher status within a corrupt operation are pretending or implying that they are fighting it. Their reasoning is usually scanty as they prefer to focus your attention on the JWO talking points being promoted throughout the world that apply to their advocacy and imply the focus is "resistance" when it is really "scrambling for crumbs" (1). Those folks, maneuvering within the deceitful JWO mechanism are referred to in the protocols as third tier dissent:
protocols 12-11. In the third rank we shall set up our own, to all appearance, off position, which, in at least one of its organs, will present what looks like the very antipodes to us. Our real opponents at heart will accept this simulated opposition as their own and will show us their cards.
The first two tiers deal with the 85% of sleeping sheep who assume there are only outside enemies to worry about. The third tier is a bit more sophisticated because it deals with a brood with moderately better critical thinking skills and are willing to make a beginning effort to confront the lying elites. This forces the lying elites to send out agents who lie for them as they pretend to be for us. Who all this might be is included here in this same protocols:
12. All 2ouwa@r newspapers will be of all possible complexions - aristocratic, republican, revolutionary, even anarchical - for so long, of course, as the constitution exists ....
Like the Indian idol "Vishnu" they will have a hundred hands, and every one of them will have a finger on any one of the public opinions as required. When a pulse quickens these hands will lead opinion in the direction of our aims, for an excited patient loses all power of judgment and easily yields to suggestion.
Those fools who will think they are repeating the opinion of a newspaper of their own camp will be repeating our opinion or any opinion that seems desirable for us.
Regular readers of mine may become tired of seeing me go to protocol 12 all the time for backup. It just so happens that the movement is stuck within this mirage, being mesmerized by tricksters working within the apparatus who are being paid by coin from the enemy's pockets. They have assumed leadership of the disgruntled little people, awoken, to an extent, more than usual by apparent false flag epidemics. These are easy to see through and easy to ignore by false resistance operatives and those who would prefer to think good thoughts of their rulers or at minimum, give them the benefit of the doubt. Requiring little proof in taking the word of the TPTB's information apparatus, they expect those of us who expose the ruse to provide irrefutable proof in our complaints. If they were true resistance, would it not be the other way around?
such as the holocaust, 911, etc.Bolstered by a setup where our generals work for the enemy they pretend to fight, when some are questioned for loyalty, the disloyal posers of loyalty all join hands in support and often attack the exposer of lies. Most attacks deal little with the subject at hand and more with supposed flaws in the message giver. Whether that be human nature or something mind controlled into those living within the JWO, we do know that the JWO uses that tactic all the time to safeguard their lynchpin lies
This article is for those that have an inkling of what I speak but are torn between the habit of subscribing to the fake dissent machine or fully going their own way. When you unsubscribe, you read their lies, thereafter, to critique and analyze the illogic of the false direction, not to get comfort. So what are some of the clues that a fake dissent op gives off that may be used to tell whether someone is likely legit in taking on this JWO subversion or performing slight of hand?
First of all, you have to observe the totality of their mission which may take a month or two to assimilate. Misdirection succeeds by gaining the trust of their targets with good information so they can then misdirect with bad information or useless information. It goes without saying "privileged information is passed on to these Benedict Arnolds for just such a purpose, to make proles think they are experts.
The accuracy of your judgment when scrutinizing will depend on the accuracy of your world view of exactly what comprises the JWO in totality. If you don't get it all, you will miss what you don't get. One of the article links above is concerning my report that the JWO started with the Christianity psyop. When one makes that decision one can then assume anyone taking pride in Christianity and accepting it as their own is either a useful idiot for the Jew or an agent of the Jew.
I realize the Christianity question is an extremely controversial one to broach and in my broaching it, I am hoping that it will free up, for scrutiny, the other easier to digest psyops like the Protestant Reformation psyop, all revolutions, liberalism, and goy wars. Our disadvantage is that the Jews have caused all the mayhem and the goy are unschooled on revolution without following Jewish lead (Usually, the Jewish lead is covert in nature).
So, to reiterate things I have said before, the Jew World Order is an international covert ruling apparatus that has been in existence for 2000 years. Their intent is to evolve into a system with a one world government, one race slave mentality (except for themselves) with a few million aristocrats supporting their rule and a huge police force enforcing their rule. Anyone schooled into the nature of this NWO apparatus should have come to a conclusion similar to this whether they have realized the Jews are behind it or not.
My contention is that there is an ongoing effort to install folks at the top of our movement who are tasked with getting us committed to the subversion with idyllic sounding language that gives us a stake in the maneuverings within the JWO apparatus. My contention is that we must avoid believing that the system that is designed to fail us can save us and that exposure and awareness of the games being played are the first steps to true revolution against its machinery.
Clues that your leaders are working within the JWO and not against it!
Let's take Andrew Anglin as an example because he soooo represents the problems occurring within the resistance at this time. As said before, when assessing the legitimacy of your resistance leaders it is essential to take note of their behavior over time and their focusses of advocacy. Anglin came fully to my attention when Scott Roberts spent the better part of 2014 trying to out Anglin as an op. The famous video where Anglin said the white race should be bred out, Andrew bought the copyrights to and has made an ongoing effort to suppress it's availability and helped in that effort by the Op, good ole boy network that supports the subversion. Also, just recently, I found his old site, "Total Fascism", inaccessible on the "Wayback Machine".
Well, knock my head off with little apples, it's back up. I think I'll celebrate and repost this gem of Andrew's
"We, as others on the web, also differ from the various “Neo-Nazi” movements, who are in large part made up of drunken idiots, who appear to lump the blacks and Arabs – two groups with which we share a common enemy – with the Jew, and thus destroy any real chance we have of presenting a unified global front against this international plot against all people. Most of these groups appear to be founded and run by Jews."
"Yes, basically the entire religion of Islam is geared toward fighting the Jew. A lot of the anti-Muslim groups (almost entirely Jewish) will quote various Hadith (commentary which isn’t considered cannon by the mainstream, each individual Muslim sect respects different Hadith which have been written by different post-Mohammedian scholars) that possibly say something like “go take over the world and kill anyone who disagrees with you,” but the actual core doctrine of Islam – the Quaran, which is the only text that is universally accepted by all Muslims – says that you should respect both pagan and Christian people, simply saying that you should charge them an extra tax when they live in Muslim lands, as they are not a part of the majority collective, which sounds pretty reasonable to me....The people such as the Rat Jew Robert Spencer who want to push the militant anti-Islamic doctrine have a very clear agenda for doing so. The Muslims, like us, are the enemy of the Jew, and whereas we have the saying “the enemy of my enemy is my friend,” the Jews, having no friends, seem to say “my enemy should be the enemy of my enemy”."
Aw Shucks, when it rains it pours!:
December 20, 2012 at 8:05 am
I am all for White Power, but I oppose the hateful nature of most of the alleged Nazi groups currently in existence. Most of them appear to be funded by Jews. They are hateful and generally dumbed down morons. Pushing off things on black people is a completely Jewish tactic. This is not to say there are not a whole long list of very valid complaints we can lodge at black America, but why are they like this? Who brought them to America in the first place? Who killed their valid Black Nationalist leaders in the 60s? Who ships drugs and guns into their neighborhoods and then produces music telling them it is cool to sell drugs and kill people?
I’ll give you three guesses, and the first two don’t count.
*** AM I missing something here or is Anglin blaming everything on the Jews, like it's a conspiracy or something?***
A year after that, he made the statement on "Total Fascism" that we should work with blacks and Muslims rather than fight them (added above). A year after that, he was writing articles playing up of Pam Geller like Islamaphobia so here we have an example of a wandering morality system. We have a character who expects you to believe that his SJW side disappeared with one reading of Mein Kampf.
Now, what is his focus these days? First of all, Andrew has made great efforts to tell people as fact, that the Jews do not conspire.This paves the way for an independent problematic Muslim and black movement, an essential part of being a 3rd tier dissent operation within the JWO power structure if you are anti-Semitic (willing to tell truths about Jews). This allows himself to demand total proof that the protocols were written by Jews or he can discount the claim. It allows him to disregard Jewish maneuverings to make both WWI and WWII happen or the Jews being behind the big revolutions or Protestant movement much less Christianity.
Since the Jews don't conspire, he can claim that the news media didn't cover up 911, we just don't have all the facts. He can claim there is no reason to doubt 20 people died at Sandy Hook because there is not irrefutable proof 20 people didn't die! He can assume all the media killing events are as portrayed and not false flags to do Jewish bidding. These are all signs that Andrew is working within acceptable levels of JWO dissent for how can one get to the truth of a situation by using a lie as a starting point?
Why that behavior is tempting for Andrew personally is that by accepting Jew lies in certain places, he gets coverage by them in the MSM and other popular subversive ops trat him as important
These are all signs that Andrew's op simply is maneuvering for a better position within the JWO whether for personal fame or some fake glory for the white race that three years ago he said should be bred out because they went all over the world and fucked everybody.
False Flag reporting is a very good way to tell if an op is working for the system or against it.
If an op simply takes news coverage at face value and uses the claims to then promote a narrative conducive to the claimed event being promoted we have a problem. I will again go to the protocols 12 to state the quote about the JEW ROSE COLORED GLASSES:
5. If already now we have contrived to possess ourselves of the minds of the goy communities to such an extent the they all come near looking upon the events of the world through the colored glasses of those spectacles we are setting astride their noses
Folks if buying false flag claims as real events aren't keeping the Jew Rose Colored glasses on, I don't know what is. Here they flat out tell you that people assimilate events through the eyes of the Jew and we then have a staged event killing involving crisis actors and pretending it's real because the Jew says it is.
Does this expose or enhance Jewish power, blindly parrotting their claims? It enhances Jewish power to act like a Jewish lie is true, always. Believing false flags is a blatant case of Jew Rose Colored Glasses blindness. There is no more direct way to expose Jewish power than to expose an obvious Jewish lie
As a "hate site," Anglin is allowed to expose one lie, the JEWISH HOLOCAUST PSYOP. This is allowed because his "hate advocacy" delegitimizes him to everyone else, not of that specific mindset that he promotes. For his cooperation simply notice all the sites giving what Anglin says weight and assume they are part of the good ole boy psyop network...LIKE DAVID DUKE WHO PROMOTES ANDREW A LOT. He also says the Protocols of Zion are fiction:
David Duke Admits that “Protocols of Zion” Is Fiction
***the ADL advertising a "controlled" anti-Semite***
David Duke, virulent anti-Semite and former Klan leader, is desperately promoting his yet-to be released book, The Illustrated Protocols of Zion. Duke’s book is based on The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, a well-known 19th- century forgery that purports to be a secret plan of Jews to take over the world. In a video about the book posted originally on Duke’s YouTube channel, Duke admits that the original Protocols is a work of fiction. He is taking a different tack than most anti-Semites who see the Protocols as an actual blueprint for world domination by Jews. While Duke declares that the original Protocols is a work of “literary fantasy,” he argues that his own version surpasses the original in documenting Jewish power.
Throughout the video used to promote the Illustrated Protocols, Duke claims that the elders of Zion are now known as the leaders of Zionism. He then goes on to assert that Jews control the government, banking, the media and Hollywood. Though Duke tries to present Illustrated Protocols of Zion as a ground-breaking work, the book merely rehashes the same anti-Semitic themes as Duke’s previous works. Like the original Protocols, the purpose of Duke’s book and video is to promote hatred against the Jews.
Though Duke has been promoting The Illustrated Protocolsfor months on his website in an effort to get it printed, he sent an “emergency” appeal for money to supporters this week. In the appeal, he claims that the Illustrated Protocolsvideo posted on his YouTube channel was removed due to a Jewish conspiracy against him. He also claims that YouTube is going to terminate the “David Duke Channel” in 10 days.In this latest ploy to raise money, Duke blames “Jewish extremists” for trying to prevent his books and videos from being seen, However, in reality, many of Duke’s videos remain on YouTube.
Moreover, according to a suspension notice displayed on YouTube the original Illustrated Protocols video was removed from Duke’s YouTube channel due to copyright violations, not an alleged conspiracy. Duke uses numerous clips from movies and other media to exploit anti-Semitic themes in the video, which has since been reposted to YouTube by other users.
Almost everybody knows of the “original” Protocols of Zion—and their historical background. They were probably complied by Czarist agents towards the end of the nineteenth century as a weapon in their war against the large-scale Jewish Communist uprising which they faced. The Protocols have been derided as a forgery, slander, and lies—yet remain one of the most widely read books in the world on the Jewish Question.
In my new book, I show that it is actually irrelevant if the original Protocols were written by Czarist agents or not. In fact, as I point out, they are in reality a highly predictive work of “fiction”—much like George Orwell’s 1984, or Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World.
Here Duke pushes the Muslim's did 911 story
9-11: Israel, the True Cause of Terrorism against America
SEPTEMBER 11, 2012 AT 3:00 AM
Today, eleven years to the day after the awful events of 11 September 2001, the Jewish-Supremacist controlled media and their “political commentators” all still stoically ignore the biggest question surrounding the attack: “Why?”
Why would have Arabs from Saudi Arabia and Egypt plan for months, and possibly years, to train themselves as pilots, immigrate to the US, and then immolate themselves by flying aircraft full of people into buildings in New York City and Washington DC?
Is it, as George Bush Jr and Tony Blair claimed, because they “hate our freedom”?
The Jewish Supremacist-controlled media never addresses the question of “why” Arabs would want to blow up buildings in America (or indeed in any country). Instead, they focus endlessly on either the events of the day, or memorials to what happened.
Anyone heard David Duke talking about the holocaust?
APRIL 10, 2013 AT 9:36 AM
Commentary by Dr. David Duke— One thing must be clear, nothing justifies genocide or mass murder, nothing! Prof. Jasiewics explains though that one must understand that the fuel of anti-Semitism is the incredible crimes of the Jewish supremacists themselves. In the late 1930s and early 40s Poles, and many peoples of Eastern Europe were painfully aware of the mass murders of the Jewish Bolshevik leaders in Russia, Ukraine , and other areas. They knew that 10s of millions had been murdered.
These facts about the worldwide Jewish support for Bolshevik Russia as they were murdering millions and sending more to the gulags, fueled a tremendous anger against the Jewish populations. The professor asks why the only Holocaust we hear about on an almost daily basis is the Jewish Holocaust, while nothing is heard about the Jewish-led Holocaust against millions of Christians.–Dr. DukeHow bout David Duke on Orlando?
Here and here, Duke supports the Jew medias reporting of the Orlando shoooting and op totally debunked by others and unbelievable that any real dissent would ignore the concerns raised by those others.
how does talking about anything these media staged events want us to talk about do us any good?
The only way to remove the Jew glasses is to expose the ruse. Expose Sandy Hook, Orlando, 911, the holocaust, etc. David Duke gets a major fail and shows himself to be part of the Jew World Order with his analysis. Sadly, we are so used to subverted opinion, this passes for genuine. We have been so trained not to think critically or to make excuses for subversive goy, it all gets a big pass by us and they have come to assume it will.If you wish to out the JWO, you must give Duke and Anglin a big fat fail here. A woman being interviewed by Duke, to possibly promote, was told that she had to drop the conspiracy crap if she wanted help. Hmm, does Duke demand the Jews drop their conspiracy crap? Not when he promotes Jew lies as truth he doesn't!