***redid this a bit. My most popular VK Clark article where when asked if she believed the protocols were authentic, decided to refute Mein Kampf and say Hitler didn't believe they were, instead and no, you can't make this shit up! Apparently Miss Clark doesn't wish to go on record refuting Jewish religion here.
The fact here, very much, is that if the Jews weren't trying to create a Jew World Order and if the idea WAS totally preposterous, they would let the rumor die a natural death with the knowledge it didn't apply to them. Just as the famous saying goes, "One knows who rules you by noting whom one can't criticized", it is equally true that one knows what lynch-pin lies are necessary to support those that rule us by taking due note of the demonization, and outright censorship and jailing of those not shutting up pertaining to the relevant topics. Miss Clark simply pretends the lynchpin issues don't exist and focusses on how many Jewish soldiers Hitler had as if that could change our tyranny with the disclosure. She is, at this time, doing her part in creating as much division in the goy community as possible and using the SPLC, a Jewish op, for intellectual, go to, back-up.
VK Clark is an NS Revisionist scared to take the truly important issues located within her area of expertise and concocts substitute operations which mask for the real thing but aren't. What difference does it make if Hitler was perfect or that you get your racial views perfectly across? The protocol issue is a perfect example that shows you whom VK bows a down to. There is no conclusive proof one way or the other except by judging the guilty behavior or not of those claimed upon and noting if they are in fact doing what the document claims. Miss Clark finds it convenient to give the Jews the benefit of the doubt knowing that challenging that will make it much harder to garner their support for her to make a lucrative living in their world.
She prefers to spend all her spare time pointing out all the evil goy all around her with bare reference to the Jew with absolutely no ranting against them, ever!. One more time I have to say "What else is new!" about VK Clark as the co-opted opposition posing as one of us continues to give this woman respect like Ryan Dawson and Zander Fuerza, cough, I mean Brandon Martinez. Kiss the Jew ring, goy, if you want to live in my world and VK is very good at that! Time and again VK sides, if in doubt, or creates a fake doubt to do so, with the Jew against the Goy so she can sell more shit at Amazon.com and be a good Jewish capitalist. She might put an "I love Jews" sign on her front page! It would definitely be appropriate, in her case***
Hitler Knew the Protocols Were Fake? VKC- Here's what he said in "Mein Kampf"
After being Brought to my attention, I made several efforts to stumble into Veronica Clark, the historian of WWII fame. It was through the "Queenie the Meanie" issues, Veronica was having that we finally interacted and let me say, it is very hard to have a one on one conversation with Veronica K Clark. She considers herself an elite historian alongside of David Irving, Marc Weber and a guy named Berg but I will get to that in a bit. Before today, I made several long winded comments to Miss Clark trying to get a response on her feelings, mainly, about Jews.
The concerns I have been having with her is the contrast between her radio interviews and articles to that of her "goofy" style off camera, so to speak. I had also noted, after comparing her radio interviews of a few years back to more recent ones, a softening when it comes to explaining Jewish behavior. A sort of ,"Yes, Jews are abusing power, but it only happens because they are more talented!", sort of a take.
This was in sharp contrast to a 2009 radio interview where she was quite clear about Jewish culpability and that nothing could be resolved without resolving the problem of the Jew. For comparison, here's the 2009 interview and then the 2013 interview, here and here! So, before today, whenever I asked her about this, she has addressed only areas of my comments that were very non-commital, shall we say.